Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 0869120170190020113
±âÃÊ°£È£ÀÚ¿¬°úÇÐȸÁö
2017 Volume.19 No. 2 p.113 ~ p.122
Influences of Rehabilitation Motivation, Self-efficacy and Family Support on Rehabilitation Adherence in Stroke Patients
Park An-Suk

Ko Eun
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify influencing factors on rehabilitation adherence in stroke patients.
Methods: This study was a descriptive survey. A structured questionnaire was used for face-to-face interviews with a convenient sample of 192 subjects, who were admitted in 5 rehabilitation hospitals located in G metropolitan city.

Results: The score of rehabilitation motivation in the subjects was a mean of 2.04¡¾0.35, self-efficacy 6.22¡¾2.32, family support 3.40¡¾0.82 and rehabilitation adherence 3.08¡¾0.41. The rehabilitation adherence was a statistically significant difference according to the education level (F=3.40, p=.035), marital status (F=4.04, p=.019), number of personal insurance policies (K=9.80, p=.020), location of paresis (F=2.72, p=.046), and status of current smoking (M=657.00, p=.001). There was significant correlation among degree of rehabilitation adherence, rehabilitation motivation (r= .30, p<.001), self-efficacy (r=.14, p=.046) and family support (r=.18, p=.011). Rehabilitation motivation (¥â=0.19, p=.007), self-efficacy (¥â=0.14, p=.035), marital status (¥â=0.14, p=.038), number of personal insurance policies (¥â=-0.15, p=.045) and location of paresis(¥â=-0.15, p=.028) were identified as significant predictors. This model explained 22.6% of variance in rehabilitation adherence (F=5.92, p<.001).

Conclusion: There is a need to develop an effective intervention for rehabilitation adherence improvement considering the identified variables in this study.
KEYWORD
Stroke Rehabilitation, Patient Compliance, Motivation, Self-efficacy
FullTexts / Linksout information
 
Listed journal information
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed